Jump to content

Lee McCulloch's Tactical Dilemma


carpetfitter

Recommended Posts

Think everybody agrees it's a ball passing centre mid we need but that is easier said than done the pitch is the BIG problem good ball players don't want to play on it week in week out it's slow and sticky unless there is heavy rain and there lies the problem also if we are now going to play it to our wide men or lump it long then we need to put the pitch back to its size it was before that joke of a football manager we had before made it smaller. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In interviews before season and at the meetings with fans , LM stated he would be looking to play a formation with just one striker and runners from midfield ..and have a team who "liked  to pass the ball and build up play"  ..so would assume he signed players who could play in such a system .

1 league game in and he changed this "idea" .......but with 2 similar strikers , lacking mobility and who played in the same areas meaning defenders were never stretched 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scouser2 said:

In interviews before season and at the meetings with fans , LM stated he would be looking to play a formation with just one striker and runners from midfield ..and have a team who "liked  to pass the ball and build up play"  ..so would assume he signed players who could play in such a system .

1 league game in and he changed this "idea" .......but with 2 similar strikers , lacking mobility and who played in the same areas meaning defenders were never stretched 

 

I agree wee need a striker that can run the channels erwin is jst a box player like boyd wee cant play the football he speaks about then the only option when wee get up the park is to pump the ball in the air

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's only worth playing if he's the "third" midfielder and has the chance to break forward and support the striker. He's not a centre midfielder as part of a 4-4-2, and got showed up today as such. He still got into the position to miss our best chance by running from midfield through Hearts defence admittedly no excuses for not scoring when 1 on 1!

Erwin & Boyd didn't and won't work, so back to 4-5-1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, samo said:

The thing that gets me is why we water the middle of the park only to kick the ball over it constantly. 

Unless we have another sprinkler would we be allowed to water just one end?

Ive never had a huge gripe with the park and plenty of teams have come and played fantastic football on it. We've even managed it once or twice. It does seem to be a lot stickier now though and the decision not to put in a sprinkler system is being shown as a bad one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, casual observer said:

 

Erwin & Boyd didn't and won't work, so back to 4-5-1.

Aye because that worked well.  Boyd and Erwin will do just fine if we start putting decent balls into the box and having midfielders making late runs. Ridiculous the amount of times we overhit crosses, no striker in the world can do anything about that. Been a problem for far too long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look back on posts from last couple seasons, there has been problems with our midfield for ages ....even when Gary er Steve Smith was fit and played there 

was not helped when Dicker was moved into defence , position he played far better than most others this season 

With Kiltie out too was hoping in his many signings  LM would brought in that better quality midfielder or 2 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Scouser2 said:

Look back on posts from last couple seasons, there has been problems with our midfield for ages ....even when Gary er Steve Smith was fit and played there 

was not helped when Dicker was moved into defence , position he played far better than most others this season 

With Kiltie out too was hoping in his many signings  LM would brought in that better quality midfielder or 2 

We were fortunate enough to have a great midfield in Kelly, Bryson, Pasca, Eremenko and Taouil. Those players left as happens and we plugged gaps well. Fowler did a job at CM when Pasca moved back to CB. Shiels brought something different after Eremenko left. Clingan wasn't as mobile as Kelly or Bryson but his passing brought a different dynamic to the team. Slater came through and added a bit of quality but many always felt we still needed more. Since Clingan left and then Slater last summer we have really only had one competent natural CM in the squad in Dicker and he's spent the majority of that time in the back four. 

This area of the team has been weak for a while and it's not being addressed. Every week we see teams run straight through the middle of us and be on top of a fragile defence before we know it. It really is worrying that another manager has come in and left this area to chance. When the rumour broke we had tried to get Kelly back and we were linked early in the summer with Woods, Ross and Welsh I thought McCulloch was going to address it. Power may be a step in the right direction but we always needed more quality on top of that gamble and probably shouldn't have made that gamble first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, capitalkillie said:

Aye because that worked well.  Boyd and Erwin will do just fine if we start putting decent balls into the box and having midfielders making late runs. Ridiculous the amount of times we overhit crosses, no striker in the world can do anything about that. Been a problem for far too long. 

"If we start putting decent balls into the box"........"ridiculous the amount of times we overhit crosses"............

kind of makes my point for me - we don't have enough quality to provide consistent service for two strikers so should play a system that gets midfield players supporting 1 striker closely, otherwise we are basically a man down every game. Between them they had maybe two opportunities from crosses yesterday, both from Thomas crosses and neither were 'great' chances. Jones may be lightening quick but doesn't have an end product, Burke hasn't the legs to play wide in a four trying to help out his full back and get at their full back, Thomas is the best delivery in the team, but isn't exactly Beckham.

Frizzell is playing too deep to influence forward play, Rory is filling in and just isn't good enough for centre mid. By having two very similar strikers up top, it gives other sides plenty of time and space in midfield which we can't cope with. That was a crap Hearts team yesterday and yet they strolled the midfield while Berra and Souttar weren't under any pressure either. Change the system to use what we have, not what Lee "wants to play"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...