Jump to content

"Grey and lifeless"


skygod

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, plunkit said:

I am certainly not misleading anyone.  What I am saying is interest was being serviced.  Capital was not reducing other than by lump sum repayments through asset sale. Nothing seemed to be done to try to effect such payments through increase in revenue. That's very clear to anyone...not just me.

Happy to discuss if you message me your number.  

 

You said a debt could not be called in if the interest is being served, that is not correct. With a breach of the other covenants of the debt then they can call in at any time, should they so wish. A football club, losing money, falling down the league with falling attendances and a stadium needing investment I wonder what the bank thought?

Many companies were called in post 2008 and politely forced to refinance debt they had even though they were making the interest payments. Previous commercial overdraft facilities that were never breached were removed overnight though they had never been breached. These are examples of a debt being called in even when payments are being made.

hopefully you can agree with the above? It's all quite factual.

no need to call me off on holiday

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bhamkillieken said:

You said a debt could not be called in if the interest is being served, that is not correct. With a breach of the other covenants of the debt then they can call in at any time, should they so wish. A football club, losing money, falling down the league with falling attendances and a stadium needing investment I wonder what the bank thought?

Many companies were called in post 2008 and politely forced to refinance debt they had even though they were making the interest payments. Previous commercial overdraft facilities that were never breached were removed overnight though they had never been breached. These are examples of a debt being called in even when payments are being made.

hopefully you can agree with the above? It's all quite factual.

no need to call me off on holiday

 

It still wasn't called in. No need to go on holiday just because you got your arse handed to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 26/08/2017 at 7:05 PM, Culley159 said:

It still wasn't called in. No need to go on holiday just because you got your arse handed to you.

feel free to read my posts again, i never said our debt was called in. 

i felt it important to correct Plunkits statement that debt is not called in when the interest payments are being met. this is simply not true. sorry if facts like this upset you in anyway. but it is better to know the reality of the borrowing of money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should read my posts again. At no point did i say debt cannot be called in if interest is being serviced.  I did say that EBITDA of the hotel was servicing debt with ease and the problem was capital repayment.  Indeed, this was discussed by the then chairman at many AGMs explaining the policy of asset sale to reduce debt.

Covenants take many forms, with, I'm sure you know, CFADS generally being the most common. Interest cover is also common. There is no one-size-fits-all suite of covenants. They are built around specific cases so unless you know what covenants applied in this case your argument, such as it is, is redundant. 

To suggest that I am making erroneous or misleading comments here is quite wrong. I would respectfully suggest that I absolutely know what I am talking about when it comes to corporate finance. My present caseload has pipeline fundraising of just shy of £60m via debt, equity and grant and I just secured a rescheduling deal with a bank which will save 170 odd jobs.  I rest comfortable with my abilities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, plunkit said:

You should read my posts again. At no point did i say debt cannot be called in if interest is being serviced.  I did say that EBITDA of the hotel was servicing debt with ease and the problem was capital repayment.  Indeed, this was discussed by the then chairman at many AGMs explaining the policy of asset sale to reduce debt.

Covenants take many forms, with, I'm sure you know, CFADS generally being the most common. Interest cover is also common. There is no one-size-fits-all suite of covenants. They are built around specific cases so unless you know what covenants applied in this case your argument, such as it is, is redundant. 

To suggest that I am making erroneous or misleading comments here is quite wrong. I would respectfully suggest that I absolutely know what I am talking about when it comes to corporate finance. My present caseload has pipeline fundraising of just shy of £60m via debt, equity and grant and I just secured a rescheduling deal with a bank which will save 170 odd jobs.  I rest comfortable with my abilities. 

Clamped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/08/2017 at 5:46 PM, plunkit said:

Firstly - to answer another point - debt is only called up if it is not being serviced. This happens when the cash generation falls below a level which can manage to achieve that which is generally because the customer base is no longer there, for example. Debt is not called up because someone fancies doing it.  A business can not always react to a fall in cash generation - perhaps the product is obsolete, but many can diversify. The building of the hotel was a diversification which created a cash flow which was no longer seasonal - a good thing. However, the company was badly run - a bad thing. 

Trust me I am tempted to call time on this thread too. THis is the part of the post to which I am referring to. I think most people on here would have read servicing  the debt as paying the interest. I feel that paints a too simplistic picture of a complicated situation.

I to have over 20 years experience in the securing of money/investment for clients all of that being in the commercial sector. So likewise I am comfortable in my knowledge. Looks like you have some decent pipeline work I hope you land a good percentage of it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bhamkillieken said:

Trust me I am tempted to call time on this thread too. THis is the part of the post to which I am referring to. I think most people on here would have read servicing  the debt as paying the interest. I feel that paints a too simplistic picture of a complicated situation.

I to have over 20 years experience in the securing of money/investment for clients all of that being in the commercial sector. So likewise I am comfortable in my knowledge. Looks like you have some decent pipeline work I hope you land a good percentage of it.

 

Servicing debt is dependent on the terms of the agreement.  That could be capital and interest...capital only ..or involve breaks in either or capital and interest. Based on your knowledge of fundraising then you do , of course, know this. You will note that I don't seem to have mentioned interest in the quoted post. 

Nae harm.but I suggest most people on here are seeing this one way...most of them are probably as bored with it as I am. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to other posts, I found the discourse here quite enlightening. As soon as we get some intelligent people debating stuff that actually matters we start having a go at them for being boring? Talk about living up to the thick football fans stereotype! Should we limit ourselves to how much gravy is in the pies and what colour the away strip should be from now on? If you can't cope with the big words or the agenda here why not just click to another thread, you managed to find your way here, its just as easy to find your way out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As interesting as the debate (genuinely) was, I'm thinking about ways to get more punters through the doors. Putting the teams performance and ticket pricing to one side for the moment, it can often be little things that matter.

Take Disneyland, for example.

My young daughters (like many others) loved running about Disneyland with their princess dresses on. Everywhere they went they were greeted with "Good morning, Princess",  "So nice of you to come, Princess" and so on. Attitude can go a long way to making the experience that bit better so people come back. As someone said before, Gregor Townsend did a lot of research when he took over Glasgow Warriors, and the thing he saw at Barcelona was that the players waited to speak to kids and sign autographs.  It's part of their contract when they sign for the 'Barcelona family', because you might just make a lasting impact on the next Messi or Iniesta.

Back to Disneyland - Everyone loves a freebie. Because they were wearing their princess dresses they got to skip the queue to meet some of the Disney Princesses, and we got upgraded seating at the Frozen show - one of the staff came along and simply said, "Your Highnesses, your seats are over here!". Realistically, it was the same benches, but front and centre, with a cushion and a wee bit of velvet rope separating us from the non-royals/peasants. But my kids loved it. LOVED IT.

Contrast this with Killie. I've bought a season ticket for years, but what added benefits do I get for my loyalty? Guaranteed I'll miss one or two home games, so no financial bonus. We used to get vouchers which were decent. Why not something like a raffle for season ticket holders before the game where the winner + up to 3 pals are whisked off to enjoy free hospitality at the match?*

*Not sure on any details, just a suggestion. Maybe hospitality at the next home match would be more sensible....but less exciting. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mogwai said:

As interesting as the debate (genuinely) was, I'm thinking about ways to get more punters through the doors. Putting the teams performance and ticket pricing to one side for the moment, it can often be little things that matter.

Take Disneyland, for example.

I'd have a "Pirates of the Caribbean" themed Half Time show. Where has been, former Rangers players "Walk the Plank", into a large shark infested tank, much to the amusement of all the old guys in the East stand..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RAG said:

I'd have a "Pirates of the Caribbean" themed Half Time show. Where has been, former Rangers players "Walk the Plank", into a large shark infested tank, much to the amusement of all the old guys in the East stand..

As long as Johnny Depp joins them. Actually, the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series of films is about the only thing Depp is good in as his overacting fits the part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...