bute-killiefan Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 According to the Stat men 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin1869 Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Cool story. -4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 As Disraeli once said, 'There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and statistics. In this instance, the only statistic that counts is the win column. Football is a results business. Lee wasn't getting them, and it didn't look like he would, whereas other managers' teams with similar shaky starts, at least looked like they might. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killie lad Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Haven't won a bloody game since he left 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bute-killiefan Posted October 10, 2017 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, CB said: As Disraeli once said, 'There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and statistics. In this instance, the only statistic that counts is the win column. Football is a results business. Lee wasn't getting them, and it didn't look like he would, whereas other managers' teams with similar shaky starts, at least looked like they might. I agree, I'd argue the 'performances' were despite McCulloch. The stories of how bad training was is proof enough that getting rid is the best thing for us. Edited October 10, 2017 by bute-killiefan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch14 Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Saw that a few days ago and found it interesting. I think those exact same numbers could be used to show that there is a good squad there that was being poorly managed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkmus Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Appointing him was the mistake 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullitt Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 ... said no one ever 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRonFaeTheQueenVic Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 2 hours ago, kevin1869 said: Cool story. Stupid comment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdevoy Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 He was not sacked. He said he had done all he could and had ran out of ideas. Therefore it's up to Bowie to find someone who can do something more constructive. Hardly a massive challenge IMO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Statistics are like miniskirts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.