Sp3ckyh0td0g81 Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Steven Naismith: Norwich expected to loan out Scotland forwardhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42610173 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chum Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Scotland forward Steven Naismith is likely to leave Norwich City on loan in January, BBC Scotland has learned. Naismith, 31, has not featured in the Canaries first team since August. Two English clubs have agreed to pay the £10,000 a week of Naismith's salary that Norwich are demanding for the player to be loaned out. However, the choice of where the player ends up for the rest of the season will be down to Naismith, who has 45 international caps. After spells at Kilmarnock and Rangers, Naismith moved to Everton in 2012 and Norwich three-and-a-half years later. The player indicated last month that a return to Rangers would be of interest. With more than 423 club appearances to his name, Naismith has scored 109 senior goals, including seven at international level. (BBC Scotland) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killiefan27 Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 If it's £10,000 a week to take him on loan, that's got to be four or five times what we can afford. Shirley a sponsor isn't going to be paying 75% plus of his wages? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
historyman Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 If true he could well end up somewhere else in England on loan. Looks like Norwich aren't bowing to the pressure and allowing him to play for Sevco while picking up all his wages just so they can be associated with such a wonderful and successful institution. They really don't know down there how these things are supposed to work. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonbon19 Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 I don’t get the animosity towards SN should he go to sevco. His renowned altruism towards local charitable causes should excuse him from negative comments IMO . Playing for your boy hood heroes , no matter the team , is something everybody on this site would give there right baw sack for 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scouser2 Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 (edited) IF true then that is too expensive for a club like ours even if a part of the payment is met by "outside sources" ...and if the player is not going to then sign a permanent deal as and when he is freed I am sure SC could use that wage money better on a few other loan deals or even a permanent signing or 2 Edited January 8, 2018 by Scouser2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skygod Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 16 minutes ago, killiefan27 said: If it's £10,000 a week to take him on loan, that's got to be four or five times what we can afford. Shirley a sponsor isn't going to be paying 75% plus of his wages? As I said above, and as hinted at in the BBC article, he can't be forced to go somewhere against his will. If, say, Leeds Utd are offering £10k a week and Killie £4k and he insists that he only wants to play in Scotland, Norwich have to decide whether they want to have him stay and pay his full wages, or to get him out the door for a small contribution. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfc_superteam Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 24 minutes ago, WIGHT and BLUE said: 13 pages of knownowt bull on here. He ain't coming... never was ! Look at the know it all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piffer Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Oh well it was exciting while it lasted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-transfer-news/transfer-news-live-celtic-rangers-11815846.amp?__twitter_impression=true 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shug2930 Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 10 minutes ago, skygod said: As I said above, and as hinted at in the BBC article, he can't be forced to go somewhere against his will. If, say, Leeds Utd are offering £10k a week and Killie £4k and he insists that he only wants to play in Scotland, Norwich have to decide whether they want to have him stay and pay his full wages, or to get him out the door for a small contribution. Correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty66 Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 37 minutes ago, Bonbon19 said: I don’t get the animosity towards SN should he go to sevco. His renowned altruism towards local charitable causes should excuse him from negative comments IMO . Playing for your boy hood heroes , no matter the team , is something everybody on this site would give there right baw sack for Exactly. The Sevco fans who are anti Naismith are the knuckle draggers who didn't like the truth he spoke. The more educated amongst them realise he would be a good signing 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 44 minutes ago, killiefan27 said: If it's £10,000 a week to take him on loan, that's got to be four or five times what we can afford. Shirley a sponsor isn't going to be paying 75% plus of his wages? I'm sure the Naismith money will be funded from a one off investment by someone rather than coming out of the wage budget, the same way as the Mulumbu deal is by Billy Bowie. If someone decides to put in £170k to fund it that's very much up to them. Alan McLeish has said online that Norwich are looking for £10k a week, I'd guess that's where the media are getting the figure from. The fact that he's said that would pretty much confirm an approach has been made by Kilmarnock, it would also suggest that it's probably going to be at least partially QTS funded - that's if it happens at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Fletch said: I'm sure the Naismith money will be funded from a one off investment by someone rather than coming out of the wage budget, the same way as the Mulumbu deal is by Billy Bowie. If someone decides to put in £170k to fund it that's very much up to them. Alan McLeish has said online that Norwich are looking for £10k a week, I'd guess that's where the media are getting the figure from. The fact that he's said that would pretty much confirm an approach has been made by Kilmarnock, it would also suggest that it's probably going to be at least partially QTS funded - that's if it happens at all. Where's AM talking about it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullitt Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 7 minutes ago, Fletch said: I'm sure the Naismith money will be funded from a one off investment by someone rather than coming out of the wage budget, the same way as the Mulumbu deal is by Billy Bowie. If someone decides to put in £170k to fund it that's very much up to them. Alan McLeish has said online that Norwich are looking for £10k a week, I'd guess that's where the media are getting the figure from. The fact that he's said that would pretty much confirm an approach has been made by Kilmarnock, it would also suggest that it's probably going to be at least partially QTS funded - that's if it happens at all. Bowie is funding Mulumbu? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 9 minutes ago, Squirrelhumper said: Where's AM talking about it? There was a screenshot kicking around on social media of something that was said on social media. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 4 minutes ago, Bullitt said: Bowie is funding Mulumbu? I don't think he is, SC said at the AGM Mulumbu was on basically a tiny wage to get himself fit/in shop window. Only reason he's here is cos he knows SC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 4 minutes ago, Bullitt said: Bowie is funding Mulumbu? He's at least partially subsidising it is my understanding. That's not concrete, only what I've heard. I did hear he plowed a lot of money into the deal though. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletch Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Squirrelhumper said: I don't think he is, SC said at the AGM Mulumbu was on basically a tiny wage to get himself fit/in shop window. Only reason he's here is cos he knows SC. He said he's on peanuts. I don't think it's actually true though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullitt Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Fletch said: He's at least partially subsidising it is my understanding. That's not concrete, only what I've heard. I did hear he plowed a lot of money into the deal though. If he is funding deals for us, I think every Killie fan has an obligation to have more fibre in their diet and keep his business turning a profit. Edited January 8, 2018 by Bullitt Changed turding a profit to turning... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullitt Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 13 minutes ago, Fletch said: He said he's on peanuts. I don't think it's actually true though. I agree. I doubt he's handed a bag of KP nuts every week -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Souleycouley93 Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 On loan jones bridging gap plus money from Norwich . Only way I can see is getting him atm . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
undefined Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 1 hour ago, Bonbon19 said: I don’t get the animosity towards SN should he go to sevco. His renowned altruism towards local charitable causes should excuse him from negative comments IMO . Playing for your boy hood heroes , no matter the team , is something everybody on this site would give there right baw sack for You have multiple bawsacks? s**t. Is that the norm? Think I best make an appointment at the GP. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullitt Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Just now, Souleycouley93 said: On loan jones bridging gap plus money from Norwich . Only way I can see is getting him atm . See to be fair, the longer its gone on the less interested I'm becoming. We have a manager in Clarke who's more than capable of using his connections to get us someone from a top club on loan, or as demonstrated with Mulumbu, someone who worked with him before that will play for vastly reduced wages. The days of Locke and Johnston are in the past. No 13 players signed and paraded in one day either. A bit of stability it feels like. Would Clarke really even be looking at Naisy? Was the idea put in his head because of the connection he has with the club? There is seemingly two Manchester United players we have been sniffing about to take on loan from their academy. I think our business will likely come from that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.