Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Sounds like a proper challenger for the no 1. I've still to be sold on Mcrorie, this isnt a young loan backup keeper signing in case of an injury to Mcrorie 

Edited by Dan1el
Posted
2 hours ago, Souleycouley93 said:

Undisclosed fee ? Expect for a move across borders it’s minimum 2 year deal. 

Mentions in his interview being allowed to move on for free so probably they've released him to us.

Posted
15 minutes ago, livvy said:

Mentions in his interview being allowed to move on for free so probably they've released him to us.

Would hope so. We’ve not got a good return on investment from the last sub goalkeeper we bought so hopefully we’ve learned a lesson there. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nutzkillie said:

In his interview he confidently mentions 'getting back to playing again' and how it was a difficult spell not playing... it understand how he's speaking that he thinks he's been brought in as no1. Also indicated by use potentially paying a fee, would be silly to pay when there are other adequate backup keepers out there avaliable for nothing 

There’s no mention of a fee being paid, just an undisclosed arrangement. More likely were taking on signing bonuses or salary commitments they had. 

Posted
1 hour ago, casual observer said:

There’s no mention of a fee being paid, just an undisclosed arrangement. More likely were taking on signing bonuses or salary commitments they had. 

Max said in his interview that his previous Club agreed no fee for letting him go.

Posted
4 hours ago, Killieboykfc said:

Solid keeper if he can screw the nut and cut out the daft off-field stuff. 
 

Good luck to him! An upgrade on O’Hara imo. 

He Polish and a goalkeeper. Of course hes going to be a bit mental.

Posted

Evidence is mounting that manager trying to offload McCrorie from the wage bill. He has clearly not asked mad max to come here as backup. Beach looks earmarked for that role IF we can find a taker for McCrorie. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, bgb02burns said:

Evidence is mounting that manager trying to offload McCrorie from the wage bill. He has clearly not asked mad max to come here as backup. Beach looks earmarked for that role IF we can find a taker for McCrorie. 

McCrorie and O'Hara were of a similar standard last season. Are Stryjek and Beach of a similar standard to each other ? Seems a big risk to have an inexperienced goalkeeper as backup to Stryjek. Still think McCrorie will be here at the start of the season.

Posted
4 hours ago, a1killiefan said:

Lekovic 2.0 (hopefully)

Lekovic was a huge talent. Vastly underrated. Hugely eccentric and a little erratic and prone to weird decisions. Shot stopping wise he was top class. I loved the guy. We really got a gem there and I was honestly surprised we kept him so long and he did not get more caps. Although saw him play once and he had a nightmare, dude could be highly emotional and lose the plot. 
 

Probably had more consistent keepers but talent wise he the best I seen at Killie by some distance. 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Wrangodog said:

McCrorie and O'Hara were of a similar standard last season. Are Stryjek and Beach of a similar standard to each other ? Seems a big risk to have an inexperienced goalkeeper as backup to Stryjek. Still think McCrorie will be here at the start of the season.

persoally don't feel the budget is being utilised well for two keepers on the sort of wages I assume they will both be on. I think McCrorie has been subject to unfair criticism, but signing Stryjek makes me think he is off soon.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...