Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We’ve not settled into a rhythm yet. We feel vulnerable at the back and no slant on the boy, but you’ve got to wonder how much less effective Curtis is going to be at RB instead of RW

Posted
3 minutes ago, skygod said:

This is nuts, playing Curtis at RB.

He’s trying manfully but he’s not naturally a defender. He needs to be playing higher up, causing them problems, not us.

I just don’t understand the logic of playing him in defence. Any ideas ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, skygod said:

This is nuts, playing Curtis at RB.

He’s trying manfully but he’s not naturally a defender. He needs to be playing higher up, causing them problems, not us.

I agree. I wonder if they’re trying to be clever with Curtis able to go forward and Brad supposed to cover over, but that’s too risky in my view. I’d rather we just play Brad there who can play there and let the kid run riot up top 

Posted
2 minutes ago, skygod said:

This is nuts, playing Curtis at RB.

He’s trying manfully but he’s not naturally a defender. He needs to be playing higher up, causing them problems, not us.

Canny see him lasting the full game at RB. Fully expect a reshuffle and him to end up further up the park. 
 

I do admire the creative thinking by McCann but it’s a bit square pegs in round holes for me. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...