Sp3ckyh0td0g81 Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 Several people mown down and a 2nd incident at Borough Market 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pompey Repatriated Posted June 3, 2017 Report Share Posted June 3, 2017 (edited) Vauxhall as well now. Stabbings in Borough Market. Shots fired. Vauxhall unrelated stabbing. 6 confirmed dead.50 injured. Edited June 4, 2017 by Isle of Wight Exile 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skygod Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) Six dead and 48 injured at London Bridge and Borough Market. Vauxhall was just another routine London stabbing.... Three terrrorist f**kers shot dead by police. They were wearing phoney suicide belts. Not clear how many victims were struck by the van and how many stabbed. On-duty British Transport Police officer critical after being stabbed. Conservatives suspend electioneering again (Edit - and are followed by other parties). Edited June 4, 2017 by skygod 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallus Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Let me guess, they were on the radar? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp3ckyh0td0g81 Posted June 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Now 7 dead 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pompey Repatriated Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) One thing I thought after Westminster attack was that barriers should be put on bridges in London. Obviously wouldn't stop them mowing people down elsewhere. God knows how we stop these nutters, but clamping down on internet and social media would be a start Edited June 4, 2017 by Isle of Wight Exile 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewWylie Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 4 hours ago, Gallus said: Let me guess, they were on the radar? Likely ,and what id do with those on the radar ,take them out and dump them in a river -- utter cowardly scum 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riverplatekillie Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Time to shutdown the Mosques,root them out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lroy Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 35 minutes ago, Riverplatekillie said: Time to shutdown the Mosques,root them out. Seriously? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riverplatekillie Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 26 minutes ago, Lroy said: Seriously? Yes with greatest respect Lroy,time to get dirty. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp3ckyh0td0g81 Posted June 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Riverplatekillie said: Yes with greatest respect Lroy,time to get dirty. What does getting dirty involve? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lroy Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 5 minutes ago, Riverplatekillie said: ...with greatest respect... To whom? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riverplatekillie Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, Lroy said: To whom? Saudi Arabia for starters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp3ckyh0td0g81 Posted June 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Lroy said: To whom? Im guessing not for anyone who goes to the mosque 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lroy Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, Riverplatekillie said: Saudi Arabia for starters. I don't think you'd be showing the people of Saudi Arabia much respect by closing the places of worship of their main religion. What do you hope closing down the mosques will achieve? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuocity Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 In before the lock. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lroy Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, Brianstorm said: It's the KFC.com way. You only here for the chicken? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtuocity Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 50 minutes ago, Lroy said: You only here for the chicken? In before the bok bok bok 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrangodog Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Jeremy doesn't believe in a "shoot-to-kill" policy. Sorry Jeremy, I want those terrorists dead, not in prison where they can spread their hatred. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lroy Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 57 minutes ago, Wrangodog said: Jeremy doesn't believe in a "shoot-to-kill" policy. Sorry Jeremy, I want those terrorists dead, not in prison where they can spread their hatred. The BBC breached accuracy and impartiality rules with a News At Six report by Laura Kuenssberg on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s policy on shoot-to-kill, its governing body has said. The item discussed the British Government’s proposed security measures following the Paris terror attacks which left 130 people dead. A viewer complained that the use of a comment by Mr Corbyn misrepresented his views on the use of lethal force and wrongly suggested that he was against the Government’s proposed security measures. In the item, the BBC’s political editor Kuenssberg said: “Earlier today I asked the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn if he were the resident here at Number 10 whether or not he would be happy for British officers to pull the trigger in the event of a Paris-style attack.” Mr Corbyn was seen to respond: “I’m not happy with a shoot-to-kill policy in general. I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often be counter-productive.” In the longer interview, the BBC’s political editor had asked him: “If we saw the kinds of horror in Paris, here, if you were Prime Minister, would you order security services on to the street to stop people being killed?” Mr Corbyn had responded: “Of course, you’d bring people on to the streets to prevent and ensure there is safety within our society.” The clip was taken from a longer interview conducted earlier in the day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrangodog Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 11 minutes ago, Lroy said: The BBC breached accuracy and impartiality rules with a News At Six report by Laura Kuenssberg on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s policy on shoot-to-kill, its governing body has said. The item discussed the British Government’s proposed security measures following the Paris terror attacks which left 130 people dead. A viewer complained that the use of a comment by Mr Corbyn misrepresented his views on the use of lethal force and wrongly suggested that he was against the Government’s proposed security measures. In the item, the BBC’s political editor Kuenssberg said: “Earlier today I asked the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn if he were the resident here at Number 10 whether or not he would be happy for British officers to pull the trigger in the event of a Paris-style attack.” Mr Corbyn was seen to respond: “I’m not happy with a shoot-to-kill policy in general. I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often be counter-productive.” In the longer interview, the BBC’s political editor had asked him: “If we saw the kinds of horror in Paris, here, if you were Prime Minister, would you order security services on to the street to stop people being killed?” Mr Corbyn had responded: “Of course, you’d bring people on to the streets to prevent and ensure there is safety within our society.” The clip was taken from a longer interview conducted earlier in the day. I see now that it was from an older interview. His statement doesn't exactly reassure me though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrangodog Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Free speech. I don't agree with his statement but it's his opinion. Shutting down mosques would simply radicalise more Muslims. The surgeon who treated some of the children from the Manchester bombing was a Muslim. Should we close down his place of worship ? The problem isn't a religion, it's a radical interpretation of that religion. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
findis Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 6 hours ago, Riverplatekillie said: Time to shutdown the Mosques,root them out. The same way we should have closed down Catholic Churches during the troubles? Stupid idea 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pompey Repatriated Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 They've put up barriers on the bridges now. Talk about closing the stable door! Should've been done after Westminster 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdevoy Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 13 hours ago, Wrangodog said: The problem isn't a religion, it's a radical interpretation of that religion. The problem as, it usually is, is poverty and ignorance. Islam just provides a legitimacy for angry young men. In my experience, if you are an angry young man you can usually find a legitimacy somewhere. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.