Jump to content

andy123

Members
  • Posts

    889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by andy123

  1. 6 hours ago, skygod said:

    He is working with a smallish squad, with four centre backs and one auxiliary.

    He has a contingency plan if a CB has to be replaced during a match - Dicker drops back or he brings on a substitute.

    Dicker and Ibsen Rossi were injured and Findlay suspended.

    Not so easy. 

    I can’t see why anyone wouldn’t sympathise with a manager who works on a game plan all week and has a player sent off two matches running early on.

    Unless you want him to fail.

     

    Bla Bla Bla. No-one can say anything negative about the club without disagreeing then try suggest you are bigger fan and we don't support the club. You want the club to fail

  2. 5 minutes ago, Wrangodog said:

    Mr Milligan QC, for the club, accepted that there were these two clearly defined areas where there
    were “issues” for the club.
    He accepted that on the said bus trip to and from the fixture there was not adequate social
    distancing, though he stated that everyone had been wearing masks during the journey.
    He accepted that at the pre match meal the club had not ensured social distancing between those
    utilising the facility whilst eating, by excessive numbers eating (and receiving coaching) at any one
    table.
     

    yes thats what I read. So we breached rules. 

    not really sure why everyone is getting their knickers in a twist about it. 

    We got on the bus and ate at the hilton i think without the correct social distancing in place 

  3. 2 minutes ago, bute-killiefan said:

    Conveniently ignored everything else. Proving my point. It's weird you seem to interested in burying your club.

    Each to their own

    I'm not my own club admitted they have fecked up!!!!!!

    Folk on here trying to say we didn't break the 1 metre rule etc. 

    Our rule was 2 metres all clubs knew about it and we have admitted wrong doing 

  4. 3 minutes ago, historyman said:

    Again you know this from where? Is that in the report? If so have the club responded to the allegation.  
    Or is this just something else you fling around with no evidence to support it? 

    Its in the papers today saying we tried to hide information. 

    Thats why I said allegedly as it may not be true. 

    What is true is we broke the rules as the club admitted it. Doesnt matter what any other club has done we are guilty of breaking the rules. 

     

  5. 1 minute ago, skygod said:

    Document 71?

    It looks more like cock-up than conspiracy.

    The SPFL had a copy of it, albeit a draft, iirc. 
     

    I said allegedly so possibly just paper talk.

    It said St mirren players were sat to close together in the changing rooms. 

    Little breaches but that's why covid is spreading cos majority of folk don't follow the rules. 

    Not accusing anyone on here by the way but you only have to step outside to see people breaching them 

  6. Just now, historyman said:

    Ah yes,  the good old 3-0 loss. The one rejected by the member clubs in TWO separate votes but which has now been imposed on Killie and St Mirren by Doncaster and his cronies. 
    Just how on earth can that be interpreted as being in the best interests of the club when they rejected such a sanction twice is beyond me. And that’s even before his comments which clearly seemed the club guilty before the investigation are taken into account.  

    I’m sure any half decent lawyer would wipe the floor with them in an appeal. 

    in that case we will overturn it then 

  7. 3 minutes ago, Dazza said:

    Ignore the hun, only appears when trouble is brewing and always takes anyone's side but ours.

    Like to know how I can possibly be a hun when I was defending celtic earlier!!!!!

    As posted earlier Mighty Leeds and killie my teams. 

    Thankfully got to the last Leeds game against Huddersfield before they stopped fans. 

    Leeds Leeds Leeds

  8. 1 minute ago, boaby said:

    You don't half talk some s**te boyo. Government legislation overrules SPL protocols every day of the week and our club could fight this case on the basis of that. If the goverment strictly enforced the 2m rule and the SPL protocols said it was 5m do you think that's what would happen? Stupid boy.

    Yes the club didn't break the law i agree with that. But clubs were told we they had to follow a 2 metre rule. So they broke the rules set out by the spfl

  9. 10 minutes ago, bute-killiefan said:

    It's really not when the punishment is not on par with other situations. SPFL have created more questions with their explanations for the decision.

    We were in the wrong, that's not in dispute.

    OK thank you somebody finally admitting the club was wrong and fecked up.

    Either 3 nil loss or a fine would had been a better punishment not both 

  10. 2 minutes ago, boaby said:

    The club were following social distancing protocols, the most up to date protocols as issued by the government, in cases of bus transportation and in hospitality 1m was deemed sufficient enough by the government to be acceptable. Why that isn't good enough for the SPL I have no idea. If anything we should get advised, not hauled over the coals.

    I don't think many of you are reading between the lines here, the protocols that we were following are the same as the protocols that all the other clubs were following, we've only been punished for it because it got flagged due to our outbreak, an outbreak that no one knows where started from, someone caught it elsewhere and brought it in, that's how these things work.

    The punishment dealt here is a complete and utter joke, as someone said earlier, if anything we should have been deducted points and told to get the fixture played - that's not happened because of alleged fixture congestion, something else they've just made up as they went along that bears no semblance to the truth.

    Because the club have to follow the 2 metre rule. Doesn't matter what public transport or restaurants were doing. 

    The club know it was 2 metres its in black and white for them. 

  11. 5 minutes ago, Garvis said:

    Have you actually read anything about the social distancing measures that the club followed ?

    yes they didn't follow the 2 metre rule!!!!!! Have you read the report. 

    We breached the regulations 6 players or so ended up with covid out of a squad of 25 i think. 

    I'm sure the spfl hasn't punished us for nothing it has to be that we spread covid. If all rules are followed(to the letter) Covid cant spread that easily 

  12. 2 minutes ago, bute-killiefan said:

    For all the folk falling over themselves to say the club deserves this, and citing the Celtic and Aberdeen comparisons as nonsense, seem to be ignoring two major things.

     

    1. What happened with Rangers and not testing/not confirming test results before a game

    2. The reasoning for the forfeit being the additional risk by a congestion of fixtures, which wasn't a problem for Celtic or Aberdeen when their games were postponed.

     

    How anyone can look at this and say we should just move on is beyond me. The very reason our game is a f**king joke is because people just accept this kind of thing. Why?

    Why did the club not follow social distancing is the only question here.

    Its our own fault  

  13. 7 minutes ago, historyman said:

    Sorry I can’t read this as it is blurred. 
    can you please resend or quote the part where it states we knew that the bus was not big enough and still used it 

    see when you get on a bus and someone is sat next to you or opposite you. Its clearly not 2 metres. Did they then not sit to close together for the pre match meal. 

    Then 25%ish of the squad have covid.

    Is what it is- We deserve to be punished for our neglect 

  14. 3 minutes ago, Prahakillie said:

    They didn't force them to.

    Here is the bus to get you lads. in you get!!!!!!!!

    Clutching at straws now- Yea the club never physically forced the players but you know what I mean. 

     People feck up we have been punished we won't make the mistake again. We are not been unfairly treated St Mirren have had a similar punishment. 

  15. Well maybe harsh then if it isn't in the rule book. Although I think what we did during a pandemic was really bad. 

    Kinda makes you think what other restrictions are we not following. 

    Maybe one punishment or the other would be better. A fine or a 3 nil loss. 40k in footballing money isn't that much tho. Plus I think its suspended so if we follow guidelines from now on we won't need to pay it

×
×
  • Create New...